Β§ 02 β€” Comparison

Compare regulatory pathways side-by-side

Authority & dossier

Regulatory authority
  • United StatesFDA
  • European UnionEMA
English submissions
  • United StatesYes
  • European UnionYes
CTD accepted
  • United StatesYes
  • European UnionYes
eCTD accepted
  • United StatesYes
  • European UnionYes
Reliance pathway
  • United StatesNone
  • European UnionAvailable
Reference agencies
  • United Statesβ€”
  • European Unionβ€”

Lead pathway (timeline & fees) β€” New Drug Application β€” 505(b)(1) Β· Centralised Procedure

Pathway name
  • United StatesNew Drug Application β€” 505(b)(1)
  • European UnionCentralised Procedure
Approval timeline
  • United States304–365 days
  • European Union210–277 days
Application fee
  • United StatesUSD 4,310,002
  • European UnionEUR 358,800
Annual renewal
  • United StatesUSD 416,734
  • European UnionEUR 122,500
Local representative
  • United StatesNot required
  • European UnionRequired
Local manufacturing
  • United StatesNot required
  • European UnionNot required
GMP inspection
  • United StatesRequired
  • European UnionRequired

MAH & local presence

Local entity required
  • United StatesNo
  • European UnionYes
Local responsible person
  • United StatesYes
  • European UnionYes
RP role
  • United StatesUS Agent: a person residing or maintaining a place of business in the US, designated to act on behalf of the foreign establishment for FDA communications, including notification of inspections.
  • European UnionQualified Person Responsible for Pharmacovigilance (QPPV) β€” must reside and operate in the EU/EEA β€” is responsible for the establishment and maintenance of the pharmacovigilance system. A Qualified Person (QP) in the EU/EEA performs batch certification under Article 51 of Directive 2001/83/EC. Local Contact Person for pharmacovigilance required in each Member State where the product is marketed (since 2012 GVP).

Accelerated pathways

Designations available
  • United States6 designations
  • European Union6 designations
Examples
  • United StatesPriority Review, Breakthrough Therapy Designation, Accelerated Approval β€” Subpart H/E +3
  • European UnionAccelerated Assessment, Conditional Marketing Authorisation, Authorisation under Exceptional Circumstances +3

Post-approval lifecycle

Variations framework
  • United StatesFDA classifies post-approval changes as: Annual Reportable, Changes Being Effected (CBE-0 immediate, CBE-30 with 30-day pre-implementation notice), and Prior Approval Supplements (PAS) β€” the most significant changes requiring FDA approval before implementation. Major manufacturing or labelling changes typically require a PAS.
  • European UnionCommission Regulation (EC) 1234/2008 establishes four categories: Type IA (minor β€” Do and Tell, 12-month notification), Type IAIN (minor β€” immediate notification), Type IB (minor β€” Tell, Wait, and Do, 30-day default), Type II (major β€” prior approval, 60–90 days), and Extensions (Annex I changes β€” full review). Worksharing procedures consolidate variations across multiple authorisations.
Renewal cycle
  • United StatesFDA does not require periodic renewal of NDAs or BLAs β€” approvals remain in effect indefinitely subject to compliance, payment of annual program fees, and post-marketing requirements. Annual reports are required.
  • European UnionInitial 5-year renewal β€” application 9 months before expiry. After the first renewal, MA is granted for unlimited duration unless the CHMP/NCA, on justified grounds relating to pharmacovigilance, decides on one additional 5-year renewal.
Pharmacovigilance
  • United StatesMandatory expedited reporting of serious unexpected ADRs within 15 calendar days; periodic safety reports (PADERs/PAERs) for the first 3 years post-approval, then annually. PSURs in ICH E2C(R2) format accepted in lieu of PADERs by agreement. FAERS database receives spontaneous reports. Post-Marketing Requirements (PMRs) and Commitments (PMCs) tracked publicly.
  • European UnionComprehensive PV framework under Directive 2010/84/EU and Regulation (EU) 1235/2010, codified in Good Pharmacovigilance Practices (GVP). Pharmacovigilance System Master File (PSMF) required. Periodic Safety Update Reports (PSURs) on EU-harmonised birth-date list. Risk Management Plans for all new MAs and significant variations. Suspected serious ADR reporting to EudraVigilance within 15 days. Black triangle (β–Ό) for additional monitoring of selected products.

Unlicensed access

Named Patient Supply
  • United StatesAvailable
  • European UnionAvailable
Compassionate Use
  • United StatesAvailable
  • European UnionAvailable
Emergency Import
  • United StatesAvailable
  • European UnionAvailable
Parallel Import
  • United StatesNot permitted
  • European UnionPermitted

Clinical trials

CTA approval
  • United StatesRequired
  • European UnionRequired
Ethics approval
  • United StatesYes
  • European UnionYes
CTA timeline
  • United States30–30 days
  • European Union60–106 days
GCP standard
  • United StatesICH E6(R3) (adopted via FDA guidance January 2025); 21 CFR 312, 314, 50, 56
  • European UnionICH E6(R3) β€” Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2748 transposing R3, applicable from 23 July 2025

Pricing & reimbursement

Price regulation
  • United StatesFree pricing
  • European UnionRegulated
Reference pricing
  • United StatesNo
  • European UnionYes
HTA required
  • United StatesNo
  • European UnionYes
HTA body
  • United StatesICER (Institute for Clinical and Economic Review) β€” independent, non-binding
  • European UnionEU HTA Coordination Group (EUnetHTA legacy); national HTA bodies (NICE, HAS, G-BA/IQWiG, AIFA, AEMPS, etc.)