§ 02 · Comparison

Compare regulatory pathways side-by-side

Authority & dossier

Fee confirmation
  • Norway2 of 3 pathway fees confirmed
  • United StatesFees verified 12 September 2026
  • European UnionFees verified 12 September 2026
Regulatory authority
  • NorwayDMP (formerly NoMA / SLV)
  • United StatesFDA
  • European UnionEMA
English submissions
  • NorwayYes
  • United StatesYes
  • European UnionYes
CTD accepted
  • NorwayYes
  • United StatesYes
  • European UnionYes
eCTD accepted
  • NorwayYes
  • United StatesYes
  • European UnionYes
Reliance pathway
  • NorwayAvailable
  • United StatesNone
  • European UnionAvailable
Reference agencies
  • NorwayEMA (Centralised Procedure, mirrored automatically), EEA Member States (DCP / MRP), EU CMDh
  • United StatesNot stated
  • European UnionNot stated

Lead pathway (timeline & fees), EU Centralised Procedure (mirrored nationally) · New Drug Application, 505(b)(1) · Centralised Procedure

Pathway name
  • NorwayEU Centralised Procedure (mirrored nationally)
  • United StatesNew Drug Application, 505(b)(1)
  • European UnionCentralised Procedure
Approval timeline
  • Norway210-300 days
  • United States304-365 days
  • European Union210-277 days
Headline fee and pathway
  • NorwayEUR 865,200, EU Centralised Procedure (mirrored nationally)
  • United StatesUSD 4,682,003, New Drug Application, 505(b)(1)conditional on other
  • European UnionEUR 865,200, Centralised Procedureconditional on other
Recurring charges
  • NorwayEUR 232,400 a year, per marketing authorisation
  • United StatesUSD 442,213 a year, per product
  • European UnionEUR 232,400 a year, per marketing authorisation, other applications
Local representative
  • NorwayNot required
  • United StatesNot required
  • European UnionRequired
Local manufacturing
  • NorwayNot required
  • United StatesNot required
  • European UnionNot required
GMP inspection
  • NorwayRequired
  • United StatesRequired
  • European UnionRequired

MAH & local presence

Local entity required
  • NorwayNo
  • United StatesNo
  • European UnionYes
Local responsible person
  • NorwayYes
  • United StatesYes
  • European UnionYes
RP role
  • NorwayQPPV established in the EEA (any EEA member) per EU GVP Module I; QPPV is the contact for DMP pharmacovigilance. Norwegian-language pharmacovigilance literature monitoring required for products marketed in Norway. A Pharmacovigilance System Master File (PSMF) location must be declared.
  • United StatesUS Agent: a person residing or maintaining a place of business in the US, designated to act on behalf of the foreign establishment for FDA communications, including notification of inspections.
  • European UnionQualified Person Responsible for Pharmacovigilance (QPPV), must reside and operate in the EU/EEA, is responsible for the establishment and maintenance of the pharmacovigilance system. A Qualified Person (QP) in the EU/EEA performs batch certification under Article 51 of Directive 2001/83/EC. Local Contact Person for pharmacovigilance required in each Member State where the product is marketed (since 2012 GVP).

Accelerated pathways

Designations available
  • Norway4 designations
  • United States6 designations
  • European Union6 designations
Examples
  • NorwayAccelerated Assessment (EMA CP), Conditional Marketing Authorisation (CMA), PRIME (Priority Medicines) +1
  • United StatesPriority Review, Breakthrough Therapy Designation, Accelerated Approval, Subpart H/E +3
  • European UnionAccelerated Assessment, Conditional Marketing Authorisation, Authorisation under Exceptional Circumstances +3

Post-approval lifecycle

Variations framework
  • NorwayEU variations framework (Commission Regulation 1234/2008 as amended), Type IA / IAIN (do-and-tell), Type IB (tell-wait-do), Type II (prior approval), Extensions and Article 61(3) notifications. DMP processes variations for nationally / DCP / MRP authorised products; EMA processes variations for centrally-authorised products with DMP receiving mirror decisions.
  • United StatesFDA classifies post-approval changes as: Annual Reportable, Changes Being Effected (CBE-0 immediate, CBE-30 with 30-day pre-implementation notice), and Prior Approval Supplements (PAS), the most significant changes requiring FDA approval before implementation. Major manufacturing or labelling changes typically require a PAS.
  • European UnionCommission Regulation (EC) 1234/2008 establishes four categories: Type IA (minor, Do and Tell, 12-month notification), Type IAIN (minor, immediate notification), Type IB (minor, Tell, Wait, and Do, 30-day default), Type II (major, prior approval, 60 to 90 days), and Extensions (Annex I changes, full review). Worksharing procedures consolidate variations across multiple authorisations.
Renewal cycle
  • NorwayStandard renewal at 5 years post first authorisation; subsequent unlimited validity unless DMP / EMA decides on safety grounds to require further renewal. CMAs renewed annually until conversion to full MA.
  • United StatesFDA does not require periodic renewal of NDAs or BLAs, approvals remain in effect indefinitely subject to compliance, payment of annual program fees, and post-marketing requirements. Annual reports are required.
  • European UnionInitial 5-year renewal, application 9 months before expiry. After the first renewal, MA is granted for unlimited duration unless the CHMP/NCA, on justified grounds relating to pharmacovigilance, decides on one additional 5-year renewal.
Pharmacovigilance
  • NorwayEU pharmacovigilance framework (Directive 2010/84/EU and Regulation 1235/2010) implemented via Norwegian Medicines Act and DMP guidelines. EudraVigilance reporting mandatory; PSURs per EURD list submitted to EMA PSUSA. Norwegian Adverse Drug Reactions Register (Bivirkningsregisteret) operated by DMP. PRAC participation by DMP. Norwegian Med-Safety mobile app for patient reporting.
  • United StatesMandatory expedited reporting of serious unexpected ADRs within 15 calendar days; periodic safety reports (PADERs/PAERs) for the first 3 years post-approval, then annually. PSURs in ICH E2C(R2) format accepted in lieu of PADERs by agreement. FAERS database receives spontaneous reports. Post-Marketing Requirements (PMRs) and Commitments (PMCs) tracked publicly.
  • European UnionComprehensive PV framework under Directive 2010/84/EU and Regulation (EU) 1235/2010, codified in Good Pharmacovigilance Practices (GVP). Pharmacovigilance System Master File (PSMF) required. Periodic Safety Update Reports (PSURs) on EU-harmonised birth-date list. Risk Management Plans for all new MAs and significant variations. Suspected serious ADR reporting to EudraVigilance within 15 days. Black triangle (▼) for additional monitoring of selected products.

Unlicensed access

Named Patient Supply
  • NorwayAvailable
  • United StatesAvailable
  • European UnionAvailable
Compassionate Use
  • NorwayAvailable
  • United StatesAvailable
  • European UnionAvailable
Emergency Import
  • NorwayAvailable
  • United StatesAvailable
  • European UnionAvailable
Parallel Import
  • NorwayPermitted
  • United StatesNot permitted
  • European UnionPermitted

Clinical trials

CTA approval
  • NorwayRequired
  • United StatesRequired
  • European UnionRequired
Ethics approval
  • NorwayYes
  • United StatesYes
  • European UnionYes
CTA timeline
  • Norway60-106 days
  • United States30-30 days
  • European Union60-106 days
GCP standard
  • NorwayICH E6(R3) GCP; EU Clinical Trials Regulation 536/2014 (EU CTR); Norwegian Medicines Act and Regulation on Clinical Trials of Medicinal Products for Human Use
  • United StatesICH E6(R3) (adopted via FDA guidance January 2025); 21 CFR 312, 314, 50, 56
  • European UnionICH E6(R3), Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/2748 transposing R3, applicable from 23 July 2025

Pricing & reimbursement

Price regulation
  • NorwayRegulated
  • United StatesFree pricing
  • European UnionRegulated
Reference pricing
  • NorwayYes
  • United StatesNo
  • European UnionYes
HTA required
  • NorwayYes
  • United StatesNo
  • European UnionYes
HTA body
  • NorwayDMP (single-technology assessments, STA) and Norwegian Institute of Public Health / Folkehelseinstituttet, FHI (multi-technology assessments, MTA), under the Nye Metoder (New Methods) framework. Decisions for hospital medicines made by Beslutningsforum (the Decision Forum of the four Regional Health Authority CEOs); decisions for outpatient blue-prescription medicines made by DMP.
  • United StatesICER (Institute for Clinical and Economic Review), independent, non-binding
  • European UnionEU HTA Coordination Group (EUnetHTA legacy); national HTA bodies (NICE, HAS, G-BA/IQWiG, AIFA, AEMPS, etc.)